Chat → Structured Project
Prompt naturally while ProofHorizon builds a live tree of tasks, subtasks, and dependencies your team can edit, pin, and reorganize.
Start with a prompt—not a sprawling chat thread.
ProofHorizon automatically extracts structured tasks and projects your team controls, assigns the right agents from 400+ AI models, and runs every deliverable through automated gates, independent model review, and your human checkpoints.
Deterministic & policy gates · Multi-model verification · Human checkpoints
Every task logs its exact setup—models, tools, and reviewers—and records what survives verification. ProofHorizon uses that evidence to staff your next task with the most cost-effective configuration that delivers verified outcomes, not mere assertions, rather than defaulting to the biggest, most expensive model.
Clear ownership · Agreed boundaries · Human checkpointsIllustrative workflows · Example results, not live product data
Synthesize Multi-Condition Care Plan & Verify against KDIGO/ADA Clinical Guidelines & Drug Interactions
Draft prepared · Checks recorded · Clinician review required
Prompt naturally while ProofHorizon builds a live tree of tasks, subtasks, and dependencies your team can edit, pin, and reorganize.
Deliverables hit deterministic rules and policy checks first. An independent AI model then cross-examines whatever survives them.
You decide where a person steps in. Every check stays permanently attached to the task, so work can be re-evaluated whenever conditions change.
Use ProofHorizon to coordinate new work or inspect the outcomes of the AI work your team already does.
Describe what you need. ProofHorizon automatically assembles an AI team for the task within your scope, budget, and delegation limits. Add people and insert human checkpoints as needed.
ProofHorizon for GitHub is the first entry point: deterministic PR verification, followed by deeper AI review and outcome insights. Bring your own model keys or discuss managed usage with us.
Prompt our AI to assemble the team and extract the work. Tasks, subtasks, and projects stay organized automatically, with independent AI review before human review or approval.
Describe the result you need. Confirm the proposed task, deliverable, and acceptance criteria.
Our AI assembles agents from over 400 models, within your scope and budget. Insert human checkpoints before work begins.
Tasks, subtasks, and projects stay organized as agents work. Follow dependencies, ownership, and handoffs in one place.
At least one other independent AI model reviews the work before it reaches a person for review or approval. Inspect the result and its evidence together.
Learn which team configurations work for each kind of task, including failures, rework, and later outcomes.
“The system that says it completed the task should not be the same system deciding whether it succeeded.”
Authorize work when you assign it. Required checks follow the task’s risk; a smaller budget never removes them.
Trace work back to the original ask and the person or organization that authorized it. Keep the owner, author, and verifier distinct.
Set scope, spending, and delegation limits. Subtasks stay within the authority granted to their parent.
Choose where human review belongs in the workflow. Independent AI review comes first; “Needs you” brings people the results, evidence, and decisions that require their attention. Reserved decisions stay with the accountable person.
Discuss deployment, data access, retention, and model policies for your organization. Clinical work requires appropriate agreements and clinician oversight.
Start with engineering and security workflows, where changes and checks provide concrete evidence.
Coordinate feature development, bug fixes, testing, and documentation. Preview what was built and inspect the changes and checks alongside the task.
Organize findings into remediation tasks. Assign implementation and independent review, track validation, and retain human control over infrastructure changes.
Explore AI-assisted retrospective review and care coordination with clinical oversight. Keep patient context governed and clinician-reserved decisions with the responsible professionals.
Bring your current tools and agents into the conversation. We will help identify an initial workflow and the integration coverage it needs.
Measure outcomes by kind of work and team configuration, with the evidence needed to interpret each result.
Compare team configurations with sample sizes, observation periods, and uncertainty in view. See “insufficient data” when evidence is sparse. An agent’s report alone does not establish success.
Track spend by task and project, including failed attempts and rework. Distinguish measured, estimated, and unknown costs when comparing verified completions.
Verification is part of the task, with a result you can inspect and a clear account of who did what.
Open the preview, changes, checks, and attribution from the task. Keep agent summaries visibly separate from the evidence supporting them.
An agent’s work or assertion is not enough. At least one other independent AI model should review any AI’s work before people need to review or approve it. Pair that review with deterministic checks and inspectable evidence.
Look beyond completion reports. Track whether a change was reverted, needed a fix, or remained stable over time.
Our entry offering is free deterministic verification. AI execution and review draw on paid usage or capped credits; bring your own model keys or discuss managed models. Explore the workspace direction.
Early access
Be among the first to put your human–AI team to work. Leave your details and we’ll be in touch about access.
Bring a task, a team, or an existing agent workflow. Explore how ProofHorizon brings tasks, teams, and evidence together in one workspace.